Many creatives resist to adapt AI because it still lacks lifelike/human qualities when compared to real human creativity, but consider the histories of the following two people:

1. First, consider Carlo Rambaldi, the legendary Italian artist behind Steven Spielberg's blokbuster films "E.T. the Extra-Terrestrial" and "Alien". He was a master of practical effects, creating lifelike creatures that defined an era of cinema. When CGI emerged, he resisted, believing it lacked the lifelike quality of his handcrafted creations. He stood firm, but the industry moved on. CGI became the standard, and practical effects artists who refused to adapt found themselves replaced. His work remains legendary, and he deserves every bit of respect.
2. Now, consider Thelma Schoonmaker, the legendary American film editor behind the blockbuster movies "Raging Bull" and "Goodfellas." She was a master of traditional film editing, skillfully shaping Martin Scorsese’s films with razor-sharp precision. When digital editing emerged, she didn’t resist—she adapted. Though she cherished the tactile feel of cutting on film, she embraced the new tools, recognizing that storytelling mattered more than the medium. Her mastery remained legendary, and upto date, she continues to define cinematic editing.

These two stories serve as cautionary tales: technology will evolve, with or without us. The choice is ours—do we integrate AI as a tool to enhance our craft, or do we resist and risk obsolescence?